Players and Profiles


“15/01/2013 00h07
Climate heats in the Library! ‘You’re acting like an idiot’, Dhomini to Elieser”
This discussion is not well explained on the site. In fact is skewed to favor Eli. The subject has to do with gaming and friendship. As in business, game is game and friendships are apart. Elieser says is Dhomini a player, and was not a friend, because he took advantage of a slip and “burned” him (Eli) on National TV Network. He’s half right, and half have Dhomini guilt.

If Eli changed his mind about his vote why not warned Dhomini since before had revealed to him his vote, or rather his non-vote in Ivan? If his “good friend” Dhomini had asked not to vote for Ivan, why accept and then turned back without alerting him? And after voting, why he ran to Ivan and apologize for having voted for him? This information allowed Ivan to find out who had voted for him. The answers are very simple. For the first 2 questions the answer is that he tried to deceive Dhomini, perhaps in order to drive him to a wrong strategy.

To the other question, he clearly wanted Dhomini to take cognizance of the fact, to allow exposure of the existence of a possible plot to walling someone other than Ivan. What he did not expect was that Bial it would make possible, in live broadcast, putting the falsity of Eli uncovered. Normally a dishonest game is characterized by falsehood. In a game is where cheats are more objectionable.

Eli thought that with his vote, Ivan would not be walled. He figured that wasting their vote would look good in the tape and nobody would notice his trickery and cowardice, and seeing that hesitated, tried to correct or mitigate the error quickly. Judged that Dhomini would not remember it or he himself had forgotten what he told. The memory generally apportions the intelligent and Dhomini was not champion for nothing, while Elieser, was eliminated earlier (BBB10) by a performance below the critical. He is a big boy, as they say almost all women in the house. Only serves to be consumed at the time as a pizza and not to be wrapped for travel!

In his narrow intelligence, Eli thinks he can take down a champion with a cheat so childish. Eli says he no longer considers Dhomini as a friend because he did not seek Eli before exposing him in live show, but Dhomini could not guess that this topic would come to the fore at this time. Instead, Eli was aware of what he did and if he considered himself as a friend of Dhomini, why not searched his friend to explain himself before that could happen?

In other words who was not a friend was Elieser because he induce someone to error, and left to spend the time that hanged himself in the chicanery that he, Elieser, tried arming. Then tried to justify his mistake with almost the entire house with the sole intention of “burning” the “friend”! In fact the intention from the beginning was that possibility. On the other hand, if Elieser think someone there is a friend of someone, can only be stupid. If he means that someone there is not a player is doubly stupid.

He is triply stupid for not realizing that he was chosen in the casting for his profile gossip, voluble, false and cowardly, shown in issue 10 of which participated. Could have used it to undo that image, but is confirming. He would like that Dhomini had for him the consideration he had from Angelica Morango (Strawberry – BBB10), giving him a chance to redeem himself and show up himself, but forgets that not everyone is like her and no one has obligation to be his protector, guardian angel or mentor, much less in a RS. He is the one who must take attitudes for his actions, and do not seem to be good at it.

“15/01/2013 2:29 a.m.
After an early morning with outpourings of Elieser about the discussion he had with Dhomini in Library Room, Aslan draws his conclusions. “We had the first revelation of combining voting”, the citizen of Pernambuco concludes by referring to the reason of disagreement among the veterans.”

Map locator of Brazil's Pernambuco state

Map locator of Brazil’s Pernambuco state (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

That’s what Eli wanted to “create”. “Worked” the whole house while Dhomini slept. Falsehood is little to classify it.

Speaking in profile, all there were selected in the “casting” with views to the game. I could tell that by the profiles of veterans. And each has a specific purpose, a variety of different strategy, with different styles.

Player        (style or type of strategy)
Bambam  Emotional, botched, irreverent
Dhomini   Subtle, detailed
Elieser     Fake, cheater, concealed
Fani         Loving, illusionist, seductive
Maroca    Individualist, exhibitionist. irreverent
Natalia     Pious, “clueless”, “no strategy”
Yuri          (Idem Bambam substitute, so …)

Novices were selected by their profiles more or less similar to the veterans, but always aiming styles of play. For example, Andressa has a player profile similar to Naty. Aline is a Maroca in almost everything. Marien is a mirror of Dhomini. Fernanda is Fani. Aslan and André Eli are, divided into two. Nasser resembles Bambam, with a little more intelligence. With the entry of Yuri the resemblance was more adjusted.

Ivan is the one for whom I could not establish which line will follow or could follow. He expressed dissatisfaction at having to compete against former champions, and maybe have a strategy similar to the Dhomini. I believe that Yuri was already in the reserve of Bambam, even without knowing it himself, probably. Each of the contestants must have a specific reserve in my vision and conjecture. The prompt replacement of Bambam suggests that.

Maroca also has this profile of Yuri, and is living a situation she criticized when had to face Dourado. Seems to have no illusions about the injustice that is being forced to do, and I cheer for that simply let the boat sail to the mercy of the tide. It would be the best strategy for her and she seems to be doing it. However, it will be difficult to maintain this line because her player profile covers a very diverse spectrum. For she, is very easy to go from 0 to 100 in a second and that’s why I like her. She already said something similar to that on other occasions.

Andressa is in a “secret” romance with Nasser, and the relationship of the Prince (André) with the Princess Barbie Turbocharged (Fernanda) is doing water without a real kiss to tell the story.

The couple that came from the Glass House must have some strategy, but the performance there can not serve as a parameter, and I will have to analyze them with rapt attention quickly. Kamilla apparently comes with a style similar, but not identical, to the Maroca and they should “butt heads”. Even the voice has a pitch half unpleasant, but all my muses have it. Whispering they are highly sensual. Nobody is perfect. Marcello is a complete incognita, yet.

Surveys of internet from day 8/1, already indicated Kamilla Salgado and Marcello Soares as the candidates of the Glass House preferred to enter the Reality.

09/01/2013 00h02
Colorful furniture and ‘street art’: take a tour by the external area of BBB13

09/01/2013 00h36
Flea, Library, and colorful kitchen: a peek inside the house of BBB13

“09/01/2013 6:18 a.m.
All brothers sleep in the house more monitored in Brazil.”
The importance of this news is that it gives certainty to the Internet user that he can go to sleep too, confident that there is nothing more to be seen or recorded by anyone until they wake up again. Understood, Borelli?

Farm Summer

Today there will be the formation of a fields without “bombastic” news in sight. Everything in this RS is bombastic, intriguing, surprising, exciting, fantastic. Whoa! Will “pumping” in the Ibope. LOL! For me what would be really bombastic, is this staff going to be transparent. It would be so unusual that really would make a great audience, that’s why!

Angelis

“06/12/2012 1:47 a.m. (2:01 a.m. Updated 06/12/2012)
Love Triangle: Will Dan and Flavia will stay?
Dentist says is passionate about the model and do not want to give up hope to Thyago”
Old news released during the party Cuba. Angelis was accused of trying to put men against each other, but Flavia has been doing this for a long time. This video was being saved for use against Flavia in another context (as in the case of Angelis). Now that Angelis has been successfully portrayed as the author of this plan, they are releasing the video. Many others already outdated should also be released. Very Machiavellian.

“29/12/2012 17:20 (Updated 17:40 29/12/2012)
Irritated, Angelis makes complaint with Manoella
Press officer shows up tired for nothing having to do this afternoon”
Headline biased and that contradicts itself. The irritation and complaint was to have nothing to do to fill the time, rather than being tired for that reason. It is pure “nonsense”.

“30/12/2012 5:17 a.m. (5:17 a.m. Updated 30/12/2012)
Flavia confesses that she purposely lost the Duel
Even the press officer was shocked by the statements of the dentist”
Another biased. Already became a journalistic crime. Afff! Not because it benefits the public preferred that I would leave for pointing that out. Apparently they want to do counterplay with the public, based on the discrediting of them. I am amazed at human lowliness, seeing how far they can get! I do not divulged it before, because it was a cheating against Flavia. Or was it a revenge because they see their game (of the production) crumble?

“02/01/2013 6:51 a.m. (7:56 a.m. Updated 02/01/2013)
Drunk, Angelis still hit mouth with Manoella at the end of the party and left her companion, hurt.”
If Manoella was hurt may be inference of the redactor, but what is remarkable is that a suggestion made by me in a previous review (to intoxicate Angelis) was put into practice in the New Year party. Apparently it does not had much effect, but on 9/1 worked.

“02/01/2013 15h59 (16h57 Updated 02/01/2013)
– I wanted to hit the face of Angelis!”
Isis was the one who said that. No comments!

“09/01/2013 00h45 (Updated 09/01/2013 1:08 a.m.)
First, Angelis gave her opinion on what was the real intention of Victor Hugo by putting Manoella and Flavia in the spotlight.
– The strategy of he was overthrow, anyway, one of the couples.”
Secondly, he wants to know what is the couple stronger. Finally he will know if he is able to be second or third. His behavior will then shift from water to wine, like a true chameleon.

“09/01/2013 1:32 a.m. (3:11 a.m. Updated 09/01/2013)
Manoella ironizes Isis after the vote
Stylist jokes that will mimic the Gaucha and do strike
It is also good to emphasize that from this Friday (11) there will be no more teams, and will be each one for himself in the competition for the prize of R$ 1 million.”

I bet that the dynamics of voting will allow the formation of a fields between Angelis and Manu. From what You can see, it was just conversation to steer sleep and allow regrouping of the contestants according to the affinities between them. If there is one thing that disappoints me is to see fools thinking they are making me stupid. With Angelis and Manoella in different teams would be impossible a confrontation between them with the same dynamics of the voting in earlier times.

Eventual advertisements or ads placed here are not the responsibility of the blog and are not entitled to endorsements from us

Aline x Ivan


This first big wall was predictable since before the Proof of the Leader. To be exact, already “was painting” over the course of the proof of the car. It was obvious that a novice could not clash with a veteran in the first week, no matter who is this veteran.

Beginners erred in wanting to “incite” a veteran, even more of a former champion. I’m not saying this is right or indifferent because it is a illogical strategy, and yes that only a narrow-minded person could not conceive garner the sympathy of the public showing being so “courageous”. If it were more to the middle of the contest, it would be plausible if the “brave” was right. For most who have been unimpressive in their editions, the veterans have fan clubs and Aline made the mistake of exclude contacts in their social network for futile reasons and, moreover, revealed this in a program with great audience.

Aline is a willful woman, active, and suffers from super-sincerity. It is not necessary to win a RS in the first week on her own initiative. These chances only arise sporadically, as in the case of Angelis in the FV1, where the villains of the RS turned the whole house against her and with the connivance of the production. The suburban of Paciência, instead of showing a sincere character is exaggerating her outspoken personality without the need to take care of a conviviality at least bearable with her companions.

Can she escape only by to be facing a weak opponent. At least for now. A great chance for either of them is in back of this big wall, if they’re smart! Can then modify their behavior, but I doubt very much they do this because they will fill with wind and will continue with the same strategies.

The same reasoning applies to Ivan, with the difference that he is a little smarter. However this is the only attribute that has shown so far. He has the important support of Fani and Natália, and the Leader even mentioned in the first party (9/1) that “would catch” him, if not the respect for the guy’s girlfriend.

Ivan has good culture and demonstrated this when he explained to Dhomini and Marien how and why it was created the character Macunaíma, referenced by Bial in the BBB12 in relation to Yuri. As an English teacher he seems competent, and does not self-promotion therefore. However, RS is not a tryout for the Brazilian Academy of Letters and culture is a requisite unfair to those who had no opportunity to instruct themselves.

English: The Brazilian Academy of Letters (clo...

English: The Brazilian Academy of Letters (closeup) Deutsch: Die brasilianische Academia de Letras (Nahaufnahme) Français : L’Académie brésilienne de lettres (gros plan) Português: A Academia Brasileira de Letras (de perto) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

What matters is that the contestants show their character and not hide purposefully, and this, Ivan is not doing in the first case, and doing much in the second. Push problems under the rug does not make one a peaceful person or polite and Ivan is the opposite of his competitor. He gives a bull not to get into a mess, and gives a whole herd to get out of it.

Aslan also seems to be as well and has harmed Aline, with his attempts to restrain her. If this is a tactic, is being done in a very clever and subtle. He voted for Ivan to defend himself and seems to be very crafty and cunning, having realized that the companion has culture comparable to him.

Kamilla

“17h47 06/01/2013
Kamilla sings all types of music to pass the time and animate the confined. Now her repertoire also features the song “Gangnam Style” by the South Korean rapper Psy”

An anonymous reader asked who was Kamilla. She is just so a beautiful girl!

“12/01/2013 9:45 a.m.
Aline to Bambam: ‘If you leave, you affect me.’ “

09/01/2013 3:57 a.m.
“Aline and Bambam argue during Proof

The winner of the first edition of the BBB shoots: “You will be the most complicated of the house here. ‘s Ugly to do that, word has much value”. Bambam continues: “Everyone came from somewhere, everyone here is simple. You’re talking about everybody, relax. You are talking nonsense”.”
Bambam is using an old strategy. At the time of him, gave it right, but now everyone knows that screams and “moral lessons” do not give anyone reason in RSs and do not work. Dhomini also means is dislocated, and appears to have no strategy, but it would also be a strategy, right? If he use the RS as a Spa, it may even be that he wins. If, however, resolve to play, will “break his face”.

10/01/2013 23h41
Bambam made a cute and gave a time remaining standing, while the component of the opposite group was still seeking another pair of socks. The presenter Pedro Bial even made the following observation: “Besides winning, you’re mocking”.

12/01/2013 9:32 a.m.
Bambam sighs: ‘I’ll give up the program. I’m at my limit’

Farm Summer

Anonymous January 13, 2013 01:53
I feel something very strange in the air!!
DR Champion – Manoella and Angelis, discuss relationship. Published by @konfinados on 08.12.2012 (sic).

“For this video my impression is that the beginning of the relationship between the two departed by Mano, since Angelis shown worried about what the public and her family would think. If there is indeed a strategy in this relationship, the most player in this summer’s Farm is Manoella not Angelis. When Mano came in, she knew of the sexual orientation of Angelis (bi) and also her huge crowd. I do not believe that Angelis win the FV, and yes, Mano.

If you analyze well the latest proofs that is happening, these are more than suitable for Mano (athlete – already practiced rowing, archery and more) and Dan, who also has a lot of strength and agility. The proof of the balloons was made to Mano to won, but she just did not win because she did not want, since Angelis had said the day before that she would like to continue as Grasshoppers, adding the maneuvers of votes. So much so, that they changed, shamelessly, once again, the envelope. And given what happened.

The production has already tested the popularity of Mano. They were certified that the supporters of Angelis, in the absence of her, they will support Mano. After that video edition where, on the eve of fields, Mano arranges one hell of discussion unnecessarily, it is necessary to stop and think. I do not doubt anything that in a fields between AngelisxMano, Angelis remains in the game.
Given what I exposed, while they are figuring out that the “protected” is Isis, I think she is Manoella. And if this is correct my thinking, I have to congratulate, and very, the production, because straight is deceiving the public voting. Let’s wait.
Livia FS”

I agree with this analysis at many points, but I disagree, for example, when it says: “I do not believe that Angelis win the FV, and yes, Mano”. In fact the text itself gives me reason to say: “I do not doubt anything that in a fields between AngelisxMano, Angelis remains in the game.” For me, the only chance to Manu defeat Angelis would be a Final to 2, ie, only if the two were in a dispute, in a final fields. It would depend on who each eliminate up there, to compose a final crowd to each of them. For example: if Manu defeat the other 4 in previous fields would be very strong and practically equate herself to Angelis.

Everything would depend on a lot of speculation with too much “directionism by the production and would not reach their goal of ending the relationship with them. In this sense, not worth the penalty so much effort and the resultant wear. It would just be a revenge for the Angelis be so rebellious with the decisions and procedures ridiculous of the production in driving the RS. She has realized that the production is trying to “burn her” and that’s why she occasionally demonstrates discouragement to stay in the Reality, because she is afraid of what they can do against her. In other words, she, Angelis, is not only confronting, but also playing against the production. Ie, dishonestly playing against her, gives her the right to play also to defend herself.

No way. It’s the first time I see contestant winning against a production that plays in the game. Several factors are contributing to this, and they do not know where it went wrong. One answer is: they simply played “dirty” and not only against the public. That “Pay attention to the game” was an inability inconceivable, because they do not develop a rational explanation and is not accounted properly. It was clear that the advice was against her for that reason. Angelis caught and followed the advice and they can not complain. Send indirect messages is not a good procedure, even more when the correct receiver or receivers are not able to capture.

Note: Aline was eliminated with 77% of the votes of the audience.

Eventual advertisements or ads placed here are not the responsibility of the blog and are not entitled to endorsements from us

The Voice of the People is the Voice of God


When you do not feel affinity for a contestant and at the same time, you feel sympathy for another, without knowing exactly explain why, consider the following thesis: does the x of the problem, or the explanation, is in them or in you? The empathy is like a semi-cleared trail, where you do not feel safe or suspects is following in the wrong direction. Look in more detail the way, and with more attention, to properly follow to the destination.

Statements that polls do not win RS or do not reflect the public will, fall into the turpitudes of those who wish to impose their own arguments and preferences. It is not legitimate for the production of an RS conduct public preferences according to their empathic inclinations through induction, edited videos, defamatory campaigns or apologies through promotional videos.

Instead, the road is one-way, and is the production who must accept and follow the trends of the public and treat to be impartial, without flatter this audience and without counteracting this, while acting with fairness and justice. Public confidence is gained with transparency and impartiality, because the main purpose is to educate, entertain and at the same time, earn money and prestige with this business, and all, advertisers, the station and the public remain happy.

Public preferences are like a certificate of good repute. When you think differently from the majority, does not mean that you are more original or has more reason and personality. This is possible, but it is rare. When this happens the person is immediately recognized and rises over the others. The important thing is to be humble and honest not only with others, but also and especially with yourself. A smart approach would be to form an independent opinion and be aware of the majority opinion. Where there are discrepancies, examine yourself and others with close attention and find out why.

Self-esteem is not an asset for foreign consumption, but for yourself. However, we must not confuse self esteem with arrogance and pride. The ego is always our greatest enemy. When you consider yourself superior or better than others or someone, can even be true, but it is never yourself who should reach that conclusion about yourself. The lack of modesty is never a quality, though not meant to be arrogance but almost always is. The qualities and the good attributes do not admit extremes explicit or presumed, unless we speak of God and of the saints or what is sacred!

Self-promotion is an ugly defect, especially in a RS, where we all know that the contestants are eager to appear and be visible. This is a detail that needs to be watched carefully. The attitudes to appear must be distinguished from natural attitudes, spontaneous, and is not very easy to detect that. There’s a phrase that I like to repeat: Act so that your presence is not noticed, but your absence is felt, and lamented.

A winner of one RS need not be a saint. Do not even have be a good person. Suffice that is better than their competitors and that is what we must judge. A previous winner can always be beaten on another occasion and a previous loser can be a winner. This is the law of life. People evolve, learn, specialize, and things are renewed, change and take on new aspects. People born, grow, live and write their stories, and always are emerging new situations, new directions, new fashions and new solutions.

In this mixed RS (BBB13), where people already known, are confronted with unknown, it is important to disregard what we know from outside the RS or the previous ones, and be interested to know the contestants before forming judgments. Same is the case when we hear or read over sympathies of famous by A or B. We must disregard the personal opinion of others, for more that this is authoritative, and form an own opinion, based on own personal observation.

Of course, people already known have fan clubs and fan groups, and these are already, somehow, fanaticized (generally speaking), but this should not be taken into consideration at the time of being fair. What matters is to see the performance of each contestant in confrontation with others in the RS which they participate. People change with time, some for better and others for worse, but overall, the essence remains and it is this that needs to be detected.

The assumptions above are valid for any RS, including The Farm Summer and BBB13. Nobody needs to to be a saint or infallible, just that he is the best among their peers. Nor will the critics of duty, saying they are reading between the lines of text that I have my preferences for A or B or preparing the ground for depreciate X or Y. At most I choose a muse for the sole purpose of having inspiration to write, but that does not mean she’s my favorite to win the RS or would be fair to win. One thing is one thing and another thing is something else.

Patrolling opinions and putting words in other people’s texts is a lousy defect of neophytes. What I have to say to anyone who does this is: read more carefully what is written and not try to guess the thoughts of the author or driving your tastes, or utter reproaches against opinions do not agree with yours. Unfortunately the communication does not work with telepathy and what is written, and only that, necessarily must still be understood as thoughts or opinions passed on to the paper or to a post.

If at any time match our tastes and opinions with anyone, it will not be because someone pressed us, and if it coincide almost always, will not tell us that we have no personality because of it. Opinions are opinions and everyone is entitled to have their without disparaging anyone. That’s rude, and it’s offense. If someone wants to be mentioned in our texts in this blog, say something usable over RS, which is the subject of this blog, without taking advantage of the opportunity for we open spaces for anyone to express themselves freely to depreciate anyone, offend people or this blog or our people. You can always disagree with our opinions or anyone, but when your intention is free to disparage, offend, and is rude, will not have our support.

Civility and education are not in the words themselves, but in the placement and context. The problem with writing short texts, lies in a context that can not be defined in chopped sentences and filled with evil effects abbreviated or implied. You can write beautiful and innocent words saying horrible things, or vulgar, but at the same time will be revealing your predatory nature, anarchist or Hooligan. If you can not say sweet words, refrain from saying the bitter, because then you will be seen as a silly, Zoilus, fanatical or uneducated, and never an erudite and, most importantly, lose any reason that may have perhaps.

I think my attitude should be the attitude of any fan of RS, but I acknowledge that this is impossible, because people generally consider themselves owners of the truth and have no willingness to acknowledge that their opinion is only one of that make up the collective opinion, and in which I include my. Besides, I do not intend to influence anyone with my preferences and opinions and my posture should be understood as an opinion exclusively mine, and frankly, because in not being a desired positioning for all by me, it would not be sincere.

The same findings occur when speaking “viva voce”. No one can establish a context in a sentence, even more when you do not have a chance to correct the text of the speech for obvious reasons. A phrase spoken is like an arrow shot, after which can not be stopped. The damage that this causes will already be then defined. So, we should always use our two ears and two eyes before opening the only mouth that we have. In a text use and abuse of the rubber or the correction facilities from a computer, because the written text is more dangerous than the mindless spoken word and this can always be used against you, depending on what you write.

Some contestants of the BBB13 and The Farm Summer are not following far these precepts, and therefore, are paying and will pay for the damage they have caused or will cause. I already have everything I need annotated, and, to the few, I’ll releasing which I still have and still will keep stored on my hard drives.

In general, people who consider themselves different and unique from the others, they want everyone to be like them or think like them or have the same opinions as them, when they should in fact look fit into the societies in which they live or reexamine their positions.

Listed below are the six contestants who are at risk of forming the first big wall in this edition of BBB13, after the victory of the former group of BBBs in the Proof of the Leader on Thursday (10). Bambam is the first leader of the season and was smart in making himself a leader “in the scream” among his peers. Probably will not occur the “Proof of the Angel” in this week, because if that were so, would Bial announced to the public. Apparently, the production is trying to be as transparent as possible, to contrast with what they are doing on the Farm Summer

I only regret that they have decided to announce how would be the vote, after known the winner of the proof of the car. In my view they proceed as in the last edition, where there will always be people prevented from doing the Proof of the Leader in some way as a consequence of some proof, draw, or in games and extra activities. It is possible that the contestants can not also be leaders in consecutive weeks or opportunities.

Aline

15h11 08/01/2013
The sister Aline says she had a discussion with her fiance on the entry of her in the BBB13. The reason? The fear he has of she “being funny” with another person.

20h36 10/01/2013
Aline: ‘If you want to see me get angry is someone posting in English. I exclude’
That sounds strange for a Carioca. Or it may be evidence of bias or some tinge of xenophobia. The Carioca is a hospitable people and I disenchant in view of such a statement. She should, instead, thanks for an opportunity to learn a bit of English to help the city in upcoming events where we will have to welcome the world. Even the prostitutes are doing it!

André

“14h34 10/01/2013

‘Way mineirinho’ of sister captive heart of André: ‘Good conversation, good ideas’.”
The sister in question is Fernanda.

Aslan

Aslan should not be voted in my opinion, because those who does it, this one runs the risk of being labeled as homophobic. All former BBBs will probably be exempt from doing so and he has a good relationship with the other newbies. Because they are inexperienced, they will try to defend themselves by voting in Aline, unless they are afraid of appear to be racist, or she is indicated by Bambam. In this case the second option will be the teacher Ivan. This is the situation until the end of dawn today, the 11th. André and Marien run a lower risk for now.

Fernanda

03h49 11/01/2013
“I do not know who is the person with whom you would compete … Anything can happen, but in my vision of the game, inside my little head … If you go to the Big Wall with whom I am thinking,” says Fernanda to Ivan, already making speculations on the first formation of Big Wall of the BBB13. The mineira gives the teacher a hug and says “Know that I want you to come back.”

Ivan

02h40 10/01/2013
Ivan shoot: ‘I think Bambam should not have debauched’

Marien

05h31 11/01/2013
In Room Flea André goes to sleep while Aslan, Marien and Nasser divide bed and whisper. Aslan comments on their performance in the Proof of the Leader: “I arrived in the socks as if these were my socks, that’s what I did”. Marien highlights its concern: “This Big Wall will be the bone”.

The elimination of Flávia can be considered a defeat of the production, because the popularity of Angelis should rise like a meteor, especially now that they are promoting Manoella, because they feel that no one else is able to defeat the mineira leftovers. The fields between Manoella and Angelis is the only one that will give audience, losing interest the others, unless a new unexpected fact emerges. It is likely that all the machinations of production going forward will focus on this and the bad guys will have a chance to be, at least one or two of them, finalists. Contrary to what many think, the leave of Manoella not disrupt Angelis, but shall benefit her.

As I predicted in the beginning of this Reality, the good contestants would leave early and only one or two good people would go to the final. This is proof that sustain villains is not a guarantee that the audience will yield to a RS. Producers who think this are limited and do not really know what appeals to that specific audience of fans of RS. This message from the public has been given a long time ago, and I do not understand why they do not realize it. Reality is reality and fiction is fiction. There is no room to hypocrisy and to hide the truth nor “sell pig in a poke.”

The old formula of good guys against Indians or outlaws and gunslingers is over since the days of Durango Kid, Tarzan, John Wayne and Jungle Jim (Johnny Weissmuller), to name only two characters and the stars of the last century. Even at that time, what the public wanted to see were the villains are defeated as soon as possible. Nobody wants to see a villain triumphing, or staying with his pockets stuffed with money, unless mentally deformed, or mitted to be intellectuals with exotic tastes.

Some fans say that Angelis is being sustained by fanatics, as if they were not there in their homes, fanatically, voting like crazy to rid the couple of women supposedly lesbian, and take at least one of them from the Reality. Hypocrisy is, in wanting to see them in action, and at the same time, do not accept that such a relationship exists. This is also morbidity. In no time they stopped to think that this kind of relationship can also be pure and forget what they do within the four walls of their rooms with their partners or alone and are afraid to do in public. I bet many of them would die of shame if they were exposed to the cameras and microphones of a TV, or not, right?

Eventual advertisements or ads placed here are not the responsibility of the blog and are not entitled to endorsements from us

BBB13 and Glass House


Localização do distrito de Santana no municípi...

Localização do distrito de Santana no município de São Paulo. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Inscrições Big Brother Brasil 13 In a glass house in São Paulo (at Santana Parque Shopping) 3 couples will compete for the preferences of the public to which of them should go into the Reality. You can follow their confinement at the site and vote on which participants shall go to the program.

Português: Foto do Santana Shopping, no bairro...

Português: Foto do Santana Shopping, no bairro homônimo, zona norte da cidade de São Paulo, BRASIL. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The prize from the RS will be R$ 1.5 million to be played by this couple, together with 8 other participants already selected and six ex-BBBs. The identities of the former BBBs will only be revealed during the premiere of the BBB13, next Tuesday, on January 8.

Contestants in the glass house

André1, Bernardo, Kamilla, Kelly, Marcello and Samara

Selected Contestants

Aline, André, Andressa, Aslan, Fernanda, Ivan, Marien and Nasser

See the video presentation of the eight selected.

The above data were collected in the Blog of the Production of the BBB13 and will be 16 the contestants that we watch on this issue 13. In truth there are 20, because the two couples who will be eliminated in a glass house will also be assisted and will be considered ex-BBBs also.

I’m hoping that there is no elimination in normal house in the first week, so that we have time to get to know the contestants a little longer and not commit injustices. Regarding the glass house, unfortunately we have to grope to find “at sound of drums” who are the best and, injustices can occur.

I advise no one of you to take sides by A or B or get caught up in appearances, before knowing participants in situations of stress on the interrelationships and, stay on standby to change your preferences when you realized you were wrong in your judgments.

Anonymous January 3, 2013 18:08
Votalhada – Frank Killer
“… have the sole purpose of producing something interesting and constructive “

We thank you and we puffed up with your words, Livia. You can be sure that we will continue to post. We are also exposed to judgments and criticisms and, we are democratic. What we put out good in the criticism, is that so, we managed to improve, at the same time, with compliments like yours, we feel empowered to do so and have patience and tolerance.

Note: There are two participants named André. To differentiate, we mention the one who is in the glass house, as André1.

Português: Foto da estação Santana do Metrô de ...

Português: Foto da estação Santana do Metrô de são Paulo (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Eventual advertisements or ads placed here are not the responsibility of the blog and are not entitled to endorsements from us